In the wake of the Chicago South Shore raid—which reportedly saw masked U.S. agents rappelling down from a Black Hawk helicopter, bursting into a 130-unit building, kicking down doors, zip-tying and holding American citizens at gunpoint, and the detention of 37 Venezuelan nationals—a law school classmate asked me: Why isn’t every one of these raids—where officers trash property and terrorize residents—a potential Bivens case?
The answer, chilling, at least to me, is: Because my team and I spent decades at the Department of Justice making sure that such lawsuits would be dismissed, typically without trial, and often even without discovery.
— Read on www.lawfaremedia.org/article/reckoning-with-bivens
Tag: Supreme Court Cases
Court hears arguments on when police may enter a home without a warrant – SCOTUSblog
Court hears arguments on when police may enter a home without a warrant – SCOTUSblog
— Read on www.scotusblog.com/2025/10/court-hears-arguments-on-when-police-may-enter-a-home-without-a-warrant/
No. 24-624 William Trevor Case, Petitioner v. Montana
See all court documents, especially Amicus Briefs HERE
SCOTUS Just Gave ICE a Green Light to Profile Latinos. We Should All Be Outraged. – ACLU of Wisconsin
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court quietly made one of the most dangerous immigration rulings in decades. In a 6-3 decision in Noem v. Vasquez-Perdomo, the Court used its “shadow docket” to lift a lower court ban on ICE’s “roving patrols” in Los Angeles.
What does that mean in plain language? This means that ICE agents now have the legal cover to stop, question, and detain people based on appearance, language, accent, workplace, or any other marker that “looks suspicious” to them. In other words, the Court just gave its blessing to racial profiling on a massive scale—and they did it without a full briefing or hearing and without explaining their reasoning.
— Read on www.aclu-wi.org/news/scotus-just-gave-ice-a-green-light-to-profile-latinos-we-should-all-be-outraged/
Barnes v Felix docket #23-1239 – Supreme Court of the United States
This is the docket page for Barnes v Felix docket number 23–1239. This is a case about police use of force.
— Read on www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx
Understanding Graham v. Connor | Police Magazine
The 1989 case of Graham v. Connor is an example of how the actions of one officer can start a process that establishes law. Using the Graham standard, an officer must apply constitutionally appropriate levels of force based on the unique circumstances.
— Read on www.policemag.com/patrol/article/15347041/understanding-graham-v-connor
The Supreme Court just got an important police violence case right, in Barnes v. Felix | Vox
The Birthright Citizenship argument wasn’t the only significant news out of the Supreme Court on Thursday.
— Read on www.vox.com/scotus/413340/supreme-court-police-shooting-barnes-felix
Supreme Court analysis: Brett Kavanaugh gives a gratuitous win to cops.
The court explicitly declined to answer the big question, even though it hovered over the case and surfaced repeatedly in oral arguments.
— Read on slate.com/news-and-politics/2025/05/supreme-court-analysis-brett-kavanaugh-cop-win.html
Is the Supreme Court about to make police violence much worse?
The case arose from the fatal shooting of Ashtian Barnes, who was pulled over by Officer Roberto Felix on a Texas toll road in 2016 for an unpaid toll.
— Read on slate.com/news-and-politics/2025/04/supreme-court-police-violence-case-black-lives-matter.html
A Loper Bright Future for Statutory Interpretation – Chad Squitieri
With the overruling of Chevron, courts must interpret statutes independently.
— Read on lawliberty.org/a-loper-bright-future-for-statutory-interpretation/
Miranda Rights: Supreme Court Obliterates Check on Police Abuse – Rolling Stone
Interesting article on the recent Supreme Court ruling that pertains to Miranda Rights. There is a link the the court case in the article.
— Read on www.rollingstone.com/politics/political-commentary/miranda-rights-supreme-court-police-abuse-1373376/