Law enforcement officers are more effectively able to carry out their duties and responsibilities if they are perceived as having legitimate authority by the citizenry that they serve. Members of the community are more likely to follow the law (Tyler, 2006; Jackson et al., 2012) and to cooperate with police (Tyler and Fagan, 2008) when they believe that the laws, and the officers enforcing them, are legitimate. Improving relations with the community not only improves legitimacy; it is also a core objective of policing in its own right, as identified by panels of subject-matter experts on policing (Hollywood et al., 2015, pp. 12–13; Hollywood et al., 2017, pp. 36–37).
— Read on www.rand.org/pubs/tools/TL261/better-policing-toolkit/all-strategies/legitimacy-policing/in-depth.html
Tag: Research
Patrol officer activity by single- versus double-crewed status: The call-related output of one-officer and two-officer patrol units – ScienceDirect
Highlights
•
Patrol officers work in either single-crewed (i.e., one-officer) or double-crewed (i.e., two-officer) units.
•
We use electronic police records from the Oakland Police Department to assess the call-related output of patrol units.
•
The call-related output of single- and double-crewed units appears generally more similar than different.
•
It is possible that double-crewed units may handle more serious calls for service than single-crewed units.
•
Scholars and practitioners should continue to assess the implications of crewed status for patrol deployment.
— Read on www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0047235224000977
At the time of this post the article was open access.
What do we know about hot pot spots? Does who owns matter?
This is a new article. I discovered on LinkedIn. Below is the link to that article. 
A Field Guide to Criminology
How did a discipline fascinated by deviance wind up with so many taboos?
— Read on inquisitivemag.org/articles/field-guide/a-field-guide-to-criminology/
UK: Police forces ‘supercharging racism’ with crime predicting tech – new report
Amnesty’s new report ‘Automated Racism’ reveals dangerous discrimination in police prediction tools Almost three-quarters of police forces attempt to predict crime by racially profiling communities across the UK
— Read on www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/uk-police-forces-supercharging-racism-crime-predicting-tech-new-report
The Public Health Risk of Police Violence and Pediatric Responsibility w/ Dr Jeffrey Eugene & Dr George Dalembert | KPFA
The Public Health Risk of Police Violence and Pediatric Responsibility w/ Dr Jeffrey Eugene & Dr George Dalembert | KPFA
— Read on kpfa.org/area941/episode/the-public-health-risk-of-police-violence-and-pediatric-responsibility-w-dr-jeffrey-eugene-dr-george-dalembert/
The myth of the revolving door: Challenging misconceptions about recidivism | Prison Policy Initiative
A guide to help advocates contend with efforts to derail reforms that are based on recidivism stories and statistics.
— Read on www.prisonpolicy.org/trainings/recidivism.html
Documentary Premiere: Racially Charged: America’s Misdemeanor Problem
Documentary Premiere: Racially Charged: America’s Misdemeanor Problem
— Read on policinginamerica.law.harvard.edu/documentary-premiere-racially-charged/
Policing and artificial intelligence – The Police Foundation
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform the work of the police. This report looks at how AI is currently being used by UK policing and explores some of the ways it might be used in the future.
The report, produced in partnership with Forensic Analytics Ltd, identifies eight challenges for the more widespread use of AI for policing purposes. It makes a number of recommendations for policymakers and police leaders intended to help policing make the most of the AI revolution, while maintaining public trust and confidence and protecting rights and freedoms.
— Read on www.police-foundation.org.uk/publication/policing-and-artificial-intelligence/
The Liar’s Dividend: Can Politicians Claim Misinformation to Evade Accountability? | American Political Science Review | Cambridge Core
Checkout this article. It sounds interesting. Is there a benefit to lying???
The Liar’s Dividend: Can Politicians Claim Misinformation to Evade Accountability? – Volume 119 Issue 1
— Read on www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/liars-dividend-can-politicians-claim-misinformation-to-evade-accountability/687FEE54DBD7ED0C96D72B26606AA073