Youth in Adult Courts, Jails, and Prisons – The Sentencing Project

Overview

At the turn of the 21st century, it was estimated that 250,000 children every year were charged as adults in the United States. By 2019, that number had dropped 80% to 53,000. This drop is to be celebrated and is the result of legislative changes in 44 states and the District of Columbia, as well as federal funding incentives. However, there is still much work to be done.

The children that remain exposed to the adult criminal legal system are overwhelmingly youth of color. The vast majority serve short sentences in adult jail or prison and return home by their 21st birthdays, the age at which services can be extended to in the youth justice system in the vast majority of states; indicating that many youth could be served, more appropriately, by the youth justice system.
— Read on www.sentencingproject.org/reports/youth-in-adult-courts-jails-and-prisons/

Deputization and Privileged White Violence | Stanford Law Review

A number of high-profile and racially charged killings, such as Trayvon Martin’s, Kenneth Herring’s, Ahmaud Arbery’s, and Jordan Neely’s, have been at the hands of civilians declaring themselves the law. These deaths stemmed from a phenomenon best described as “deputization.” Deputization describes a latent legal power that has empowered White people throughout American history to claim authority to enforce the law, as they see it, upon racial minorities generally and Black people in particular. This power turned the ancient common law duty to police all felons in England into a specific American common law duty to police Blacks. From the founding clauses of the Constitution to the Fugitive Slave Acts, to the birth of racist citizen’s arrest laws, there has always been an implicit understanding that part of Whiteness in America is a privilege to use private force to police Black people.
— Read on www.stanfordlawreview.org/print/article/deputization-and-privileged-white-violence/

Re-Grounding Criminology in Reality: 10 Blocks podcast

Three leading criminologists—Anthony A. Braga, John M. MacDonald, and David Weisburd—discuss ideological influences on the study of policing. The panel is moderated by Manhattan Institute scholar Hannah Meyers for the 2024 George L. Kelling Lecture.

Excellent Podcast Episode! Hosted by Hannah E. Meyers (check out her work here)

This is a must listen to for Police Officers.
Professors Braga, MacDonald, and Weisburd discuss how Criminology is known for its bias against policing.  They discuss how Criminology, in part, has become agenda driven.  All 3 Professors have published many books and academic articles on some very helpful topics for policing.  The discussion touches on evidence based practices and the future of Criminology.
It is especially nice to here a discussion on Criminology that wasn’t anti-police.

Here is the article that the professors were concerned with:
In The Criminologist July/August 2024 on page 1
The Deployment of Copaganda as Protest Repression

This is Professor MacDonald and Weisburd’s response
In The Criminologist Oct/Sept 2024 on page 8
Ensuring Neutrality and Scholarly Rigor in The Criminologist: A Critical Appraisal

— Read on www.city-journal.org/multimedia/re-grounding-criminology-in-reality

Radical Civil Service Reform Is Not Radical | Manhattan Institute

For decades politicians and commentators have bemoaned the state of the federal civil service. There are widespread complaints that the system fails to reward good performers and punish bad ones and that it does not nimbly respond to social needs. President Donald Trump’s and the Department of Government Efficiency’s efforts to dismiss federal employees and […]
— Read on manhattan.institute/article/radical-civil-service-reform-is-not-radical-lessons-for-the-federal-government-from-the-states

States that impose severe prison sentences accomplish the opposite of what they say they want

Research shows that imposing longer sentences harms inmates and society. There are less expensive − and more effective − ways to hold people accountable and help them prepare for life after prison.
— Read on theconversation.com/states-that-impose-severe-prison-sentences-accomplish-the-opposite-of-what-they-say-they-want-247550

Certainty as a foundation for justice – Niskanen Center

Certainty of punishment is not only a tool of deterrence but a structural necessity for an effective justice system. When consequences are clear and predictable, many offenders avoid crime, while those who persist reveal themselves to need more intensive responses.
— Read on www.niskanencenter.org/certainty-as-a-foundation-for-justice/

Bad Behavior: How prison disciplinary policies manufacture misconduct | Prison Policy Initiative

A 50-state analysis of state prison discipline policies shows these unfair and unaccountable systems are counterproductive, traumatizing, and lengthen prison stays.
— Read on www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/discipline.html

For your consideration:

Procedural Due Process In Prisoner Discipline Cases

Part 1

https://www.aele.org/law/2019all12/2019-12MLJ301.pdf

Part 2

https://www.aele.org/law/2020all01/2020-01MLJ301.pdf